Section 01 / 06 · DevOps
DevOps is an ownership problem before it's a tooling problem
Ask five teams what DevOps means and you'll get five tool lists: GitHub Actions, Terraform, Datadog, Argo CD, whatever the last conference pushed. The tools matter less than the handoffs between them. Who approves a release? Who gets paged when it misbehaves? Who wrote the runbook, and has anyone opened it since?
This section covers the working agreements that keep production calm. We look at on-call rotations that don't burn people out, runbooks that fit on one screen, change reviews that catch risk without slowing every merge, and post-incident reviews that end in a fix instead of a blame thread.
It's written for engineers, and also for the founder or IT manager deciding how much process a five-person team really needs. The honest answer is usually less than a vendor will tell you and more than you have right now. When we recommend a practice, we'll say what it costs to run and what breaks if you skip it.
Published in DevOps
No DevOps articles are published yet. Until the first one is out, the DevOps.com headlines below are worth your time.
DevOps headlines from DevOps.com
- What I Learned Building Cloud-Portable Services Across Multiple ProvidersDevOps.com
- The Observability Tax: When Monitoring Costs Exceed Downtime CostsDevOps.com
- GitHub Gives Enterprises a Full Count of Who Holds the KeysDevOps.com
- TeamPCP Supply Chain Attack Leads to CrowdSec Source Code Being StolenDevOps.com
- Why DNS Needs to Be Treated as Critical InfrastructureDevOps.com
- Speeding Up Software Delivery Is Changing How We Debug PerformanceDevOps.com